Is "Free Basics" Really "Free?"
"There is no free lunch!"- and FB is offering it--sometimes calling internet.org and sometimes "Free Basics". This so called "Free Basics" is a direct threat to the concept of "Net Neutrality". Here is why:
1.
It is a threat to entrepreneurs: When the services, say for example,
like WhatsApp, are offered free under this scheme. This will initially
please the users for being free, but in long run, this will create a
monopoly of WhatsApp as users will not use any competing messenger
because they will have to pay data bill to use any other messenger.
Thus, any young entrepreneur, who wants to launch a competing messenger
will find it very difficult to launch it as no surfer will be ready to
try this product for which they will have to pay the data bill.
2.
It is a threat to privacy: When one will access the any service under
"Free Basics", one will have to visit access the server / website of
that service through the proxy set by FB- literally meaning that FB can
read and access private information of users.
3.
It does not address the core issue of Digital Divide: On the face
value, FB claims that "Free Basics" will help the people of remote areas
of India to access the Internet for the first time for free-thus
creating a level playing feel between those "with" and "without"
Internet connectivity. This argument is wrong. Why should we offer a
limited set of services to those people without Internet access? Why not
let them decide which services do they want to use? The better idea
would be to provide them with free Wi-Fi / 4G connectivity rather than
something like "Free Basics"
4. Very few
things are anyway "Neutral"-let us not loose "Neutral Internet"- "Free
Basics" is a direct threat to the whole idea of "Net Neutrality". Net
Neutrality has ensured that people can make free and informed choices.
It makes sure that people are truly empowered. It effectively breaks the
monopolies of older business models and ecosystems. But, the plans
(like Airtel Zero), when offered to the customers, it means that the
Internet does not remain to be neutral. It means that if you visit
certain websites (say facebook.com),
then bill of data that you have to bear to access it will be paid by Facebook. That means certain Internet traffic is charged less and
certain Internet traffic is charged more-it is an injustice to the
customer and the entrepreneur who wants to create a competing website of
fb and who cannot pay Airtel the bill of customer who visits his
website instead that of fb.
That's all!
Thanks and Regards,
Pathik B. Variya